Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Drinking Water Not Tested For Tens Of Thousands Of Chemicals"

"The fact that a second contaminant in West Virginia's drinking water eluded detection for nearly two weeks — despite intense testing of the water — reveals an important truth about how companies test drinking water: In most cases, they only find the contaminants they're looking for." ...



Experts say it's not surprising that the drinking water company did not detect a second contaminant during its search for MCHM. Laboratories can hunt for unexpected chemicals, but generally they don't. ...

There are tens of thousands of chemicals in use.

"To expect a water company to monitor for thousands of chemicals, it just is not practical and it would be cost-prohibitive," added [Brent] Fewell, whose company works with more than 100 drinking water systems."

Elizabeth Shogren reports for NPR's Morning Edition January 24, 2014.

Source: NPR, 01/27/2014