Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Judge Sides With California in Rail Industry Suit Over Oil Spill Law"

"A federal judge dismissed a challenge by two major railroads of a California law requiring the companies to have oil spill prevention and response plans and to certify their ability to pay for the cleanup should one occur.

Last October, BNSF Railway and Union Pacific, joined by an industry trade group, sued the state, claiming that four federal laws governing rail transportation preempted California’s S.B. 861. State lawmakers passed that law a year ago to address concerns about a rising volume of crude oil moving by train into California along major waterways.

The suit named Tom Cullen, California’s administrator for Oil Spill Prevention and Response, and state Attorney General Kamala Harris as defendants. They filed a motion to dismiss the case, as the law still lacked enforcement mechanisms and the state had yet to threaten any penalties."

Curtis Tate reports for the McClatchy Washington Bureau June 19, 2015.

Source: McClatchy, 06/22/2015