Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"PG&E Memo: Downgrading Leaks Would Cut Costs"

"Pacific Gas and Electric Co. suggested to managers before the San Bruno pipeline explosion that downgrading more than 2,300 natural-gas leaks - and potentially not fixing them - would save the company nearly $5 million, according to an internal document obtained by The Chronicle."



"A March 2008 summary of potentially serious leaks in PG&E's distribution system in Northern and Central California - part of a leak database for engineers and managers of the company's regional divisions - detailed how costs could be avoided by downgrading leaks to a level where they only had to be monitored.

PG&E classifies pipeline leaks in three categories, with Grade 1 being the most serious and requiring immediate action, and Grade 3 needing only monitoring to ensure a problem does not worsen. The leaks dealt with in the monthly accounting were Grade 2 and Grade 2-plus, which are supposed to be repaired within three to 18 months, depending on their severity."

Jaxon Van Derbeken reports for the San Francisco Chronicle July 16, 2012.

Source: San Francisco Chronicle, 07/17/2012