Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Why We Are Poles Apart on Climate Change"

"The problem isn’t the public’s reasoning capacity; it’s the polluted science-communication environment that drives people apart, says Dan Kahan."



"Understandably anxious to explain persistent controversy over climate change, the media have discovered a new culprit: the public. By piecing together bits of psychological research, many news reporters, opinion writers and bloggers have concluded that people are simply too irrational to recognize the implications of climate-change science.

This conclusion gets it half right. Studying things from a psychological angle does help to make sense of climate-change scepticism. But the true source of the problem, research suggests, is not that people are irrational. Instead, it is that their reasoning powers have become disabled by a polluted science-communication environment."

Dan Kahan writes for Nature August 15, 2012.

SEE ALSO:

"Climate Science as Culture War" (Stanford Social Innovation Review/Andrew J. Hoffman)

"How Climate Change Got Caught in the Culture Wars" (Forbes/John McQuaid)

"Re-Debating Ideological Asymmetry: My Opening Response to Dan Kahan" (The Intersection/Chris Mooney)

"The Political Benefits of Taking a Pro-Climate Stand in 2012" (Yale Project on Climate Change Communication)

"The New Climate Dice: Public Perception of Climate Change" (NASA-GISS Science Briefs/Hansen et al.)

"The List Goes On ... and On ... and On: 'Denier,' 'Alarmist,' 'Warmist,' 'Contrarian,' 'Confusionist,' 'Believer,'" (Yale Forum on Climate Change & the Media)

"If We Are To Cope With Climate Change We Need a New Moral Order" (Guardian/Andrew Brown)

"On Frogs, Fungi, Climate and the New News Process" (Dot Earth/NYT)

Opinion: "Climate and the Culture War" (Washington Post/Michael Gerson)

"Study: Media Begin To Connect The Dots Between Climate Change And Wildfires" (Media Matters)

"Chris Mooney: ‘Why Everybody Must Read Joe Romm’s New Book 'Language Intelligence'" (Think Progress)

"Should Candidates Talk About Climate Change?" (Dot Earth/NYT)

"A Closer Look at Extreme Drought in a Warming Climate" (Dot Earth/NYT)

"Climate Scientists Lament a Nation Stuck on the Wrong Debate" (InsideClimate News)

"Drought And Climate Scepticism in Corn Belt" (Financial Times)

"Winning The Climate Culture War" (Grist/David Roberts)
 

Source: Nature, 08/22/2012