EPA Won't Disclose Alternative Study on Spruce Mine MTR Permit

Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

Cookies are on

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)

Do not ask me again
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

EPA Won't Disclose Alternative Study on Spruce Mine MTR Permit

December 1, 2010

Despite promises of transparency, the US Environmental Protection Agency has refused to release a contractor study that apparently outlines less harmful alternatives to the Arch Coal's Spruce Mine mountaintop-removal project EPA is currently considering for a permit in West Virginia.

EPA denied a Freedom-of-Information request for the document by Charleston Gazette reporter Ken Ward Jr. (also chairman of SEJ's Freedom of Information Task Force). Ward wrote about it on his Coal Tattoo blog.